Bring your own key

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

One key routes both. Starter credit covers your first Gemma 4 31B requests, while anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 runs on your own provider key. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 has the larger context window. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$31.65/1Manthropic/claude-opus-4-8 cheapest route

$0.45365/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataanthropic/claude-opus-4-8 fastest measured p50 TTFT

not enough dataGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Google: Gemma 4 31B

Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4-8google/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Anthropic Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#116

Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes016

Cheapest route$31.65/1M$0.45365/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough datanot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough datanot enough data

Modes chat messages chat

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 routes

Overview0 Credits routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview16 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.349 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.248 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash48 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K344 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B42 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B40 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b39 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4-8",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $31.65/1M for anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and not enough data for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.