DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512
Practical read: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less and reads eight times more context. One API key runs both.
No card required. Start with 1 million free tokens.
Side by side:
| Attribute | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | Ministral 3 3B 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Price, 1M in + out | $0.14 Engy, cheapest route | $0.21 Mistral, cheapest route |
| Best for | Low cost and long documents | |
| Input / output, 1M | $0.047 / $0.095 | $0.11 / $0.11 |
| Cached input | $0.01/1M to $0.101175/1M | $0.01055/1M |
| Context window | 1.05M 1,048,576 tokens | 131K 131,072 tokens |
| Provider routes | 24 with failover | 1 |
| Privacy | Confidential E2EE and zero retention route | Varies by provider |
| Publisher | DeepSeek | Mistral |
| Modes | chat | chat |
| More detail |
Price adds one million input and one million output tokens on the cheapest route. Prices and speed change: see the monthly reports and run a small eval before you choose a default.
Test both with your agent
Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor or any coding agent.
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Ministral 3 3B 2512 in this project through TrustedRouter.
1. Read https://trustedrouter.com/docs/llms.txt
2. Point the OpenAI-compatible client at
https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1 and read the key from
TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY.
3. Run our eval prompts on deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731, then on mistralai/ministral-3b-2512.
4. Show me cost, latency and quality side by side before changing the default.
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key=os.environ["TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY"],
)
for model in ("deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731", "mistralai/ministral-3b-2512"):
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?"}],
)
print(model, response.choices[0].message.content)
for model in deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 mistralai/ministral-3b-2512; do
curl https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"model\": \"$model\", \"messages\": [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"What is the capital of France?\"}]}"
done
Questions
Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.142425/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and $0.211/1M for Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Mistral: Ministral 3 3B 2512 with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 and mistralai/ministral-3b-2512. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.
More comparisons
All comparisons- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GLM 5.3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GLM 5.2
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B vs Kimi K3
- Hermes 4 405B vs gpt-oss-120b
Try DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Ministral 3 3B 2512 with one key.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
No card required. Start with 1 million free tokens.