Google: Gemma 4 31B vs nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B
Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Gemma 4 31B and nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B. Switch by changing the model name.
Practical read
Monthly evidenceGoogle: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes. nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Their context windows are the same size. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.
google/gemma-4-31b-itnvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b
Google: Gemma 4 31B routes
Related comparisons
Browse every comparison- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.349 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.248 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash48 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K344 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B42 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B40 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b39 combined provider routes
- nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.336 combined provider routes
Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
messages=messages,
)
Questions
Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B?
Google: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes. nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Their context windows are the same size. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $0.26375/1M for nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B faster?
Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Google: Gemma 4 31B and not enough data for nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.
Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and nvidia/Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.