openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra vs Qwen3.8 27B
Practical read: openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra reads two times more context. Qwen3.8 27B costs about a third as much. One API key runs both.
No card required. Start with 1 million free tokens.
Side by side:
| Attribute | openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Price, 1M in + out | $1.21 DeepInfra, cheapest route | $0.39 Engy, cheapest route |
| Best for | Long documents | Low cost |
| Input / output, 1M | $0.21 / $1.00 | $0.047 / $0.34 |
| Cached input | Not published | $0.01/1M to $0.178295/1M |
| Context window | 131K 131,072 tokens | 66K 65,536 tokens |
| AI IQ | Unrated | IQ 115 #57 on AI IQ |
| Provider routes | 1 | 21 with failover |
| Privacy | Varies by provider | Confidential E2EE and zero retention route |
| Publisher | OpenAI | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio |
| Modes | chat | chat |
| More detail |
Price adds one million input and one million output tokens on the cheapest route. Prices and speed change: see the monthly reports and run a small eval before you choose a default.
Test both with your agent
Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor or any coding agent.
Compare openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra and Qwen3.8 27B in this project through TrustedRouter.
1. Read https://trustedrouter.com/docs/llms.txt
2. Point the OpenAI-compatible client at
https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1 and read the key from
TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY.
3. Run our eval prompts on openai/gpt-oss-120b-ultra, then on qwen/qwen3.8-27b.
4. Show me cost, latency and quality side by side before changing the default.
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key=os.environ["TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY"],
)
for model in ("openai/gpt-oss-120b-ultra", "qwen/qwen3.8-27b"):
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?"}],
)
print(model, response.choices[0].message.content)
for model in openai/gpt-oss-120b-ultra qwen/qwen3.8-27b; do
curl https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"model\": \"$model\", \"messages\": [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"What is the capital of France?\"}]}"
done
Questions
Which should I use, openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B?
openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra has the larger context window. Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
Is openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.21325/1M for openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra and $0.385075/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Can I test openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra and Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between openai/gpt-oss-120b-ultra and qwen/qwen3.8-27b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.
More comparisons
All comparisons- Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3
- Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.2
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 27B
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8 27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs nvidia/Nemotron-Content-Safety-3.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-OSS Safeguard 120B
Try openai/gpt-oss-120b-Ultra and Qwen3.8 27B with one key.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
No card required. Start with 1 million free tokens.