Free to start

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs GLM 4.5V

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes gpt-oss-120b and GLM 4.5V. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

gpt-oss-120b has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

$2.532/1MGLM 4.5V cheapest route

not enough dataOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT

not enough dataGLM 4.5V fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120bGLM 4.5V

Model idopenai/gpt-oss-120bzai-org/glm-4.5v

Publisher OpenAI Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 98#132 —

Context131,072 tokens65,536 tokens

Credits provider routes231

Cheapest route$0.211/1M$2.532/1M

Cached input$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1M$0.11605/1M

Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)provider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough datanot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough datanot enough data

Modes chat chat

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview23 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

GLM 4.5V routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.356 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.255 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash55 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b51 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b49 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b47 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B42 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b40 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="openai/gpt-oss-120b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or GLM 4.5V?

gpt-oss-120b has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or GLM 4.5V cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and $2.532/1M for GLM 4.5V. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or GLM 4.5V faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and not enough data for GLM 4.5V. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and GLM 4.5V with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between openai/gpt-oss-120b and zai-org/glm-4.5v. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.