Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Switch by changing the model name.
Practical read
Monthly evidenceQwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has more Credits provider routes. Their context windows are the same size. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.
qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct routes
Related comparisons
Browse every comparison- Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.344 combined provider routes
- Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.243 combined provider routes
- Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash43 combined provider routes
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B39 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B37 combined provider routes
- Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.337 combined provider routes
- Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.236 combined provider routes
- Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash36 combined provider routes
Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api-azure.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct",
messages=messages,
)
Questions
Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has more Credits provider routes. Their context windows are the same size. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
Is Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.25545/1M for Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and $3.63975/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Is Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B faster?
Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and not enough data for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.
Can I test Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct and qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.